Defence and prosecution
In short
Breach of a restraining order raises many questions, both for the person subject to the ban and for the person it protects. We explain what the law says, what penalties apply, how a case like this is defended and what the victim can do if the order is not respected.
A “restraining order” (orden de alejamiento) is, in legal terms, a ban on approaching a person and, often, also on communicating with them. Article 48 of the Criminal Code defines it: the ban on approaching prevents the person from going near the protected person “wherever they may be”, as well as their home, workplace and other places they frequent. The ban on communicating prevents contact “by any means of communication or by computer or electronic means”, whether in writing, verbally or visually.
Breaching it means failing to comply with any of those bans while they are in force, even if there is no violence or threat.
For the purposes of the offence of breach, article 468.2 treats both situations the same: breaching the sentence and breaching an interim measure of the same kind are both punishable by imprisonment. What does change is how the order can be lifted: we explain this in how to lift a restraining order.
Article 468 of the Criminal Code distinguishes three situations:
| Situation | Article | Penalty |
|---|---|---|
| Breaching a sentence, interim measure or security measure while deprived of liberty | 468.1 | 6 months to 1 year in prison |
| Breaching it while not deprived of liberty (general rule) | 468.1 | Fine of 12 to 24 months |
| Breaching a penalty under art. 48 (restraining order, ban on communication, etc.) or an interim measure of the same kind where the victim is one of the persons in art. 173.2, or breaching supervised release | 468.2 | 6 months to 1 year in prison, “in all cases” |
| Disabling or interfering with the monitoring device (tag), not carrying it or not keeping it working | 468.3 | Fine of 6 to 12 months |
In gender violence cases the usual situation is that of 468.2: the protected person is the wife, former partner or a woman with whom there was an intimate relationship, even without living together. “In all cases” means that a fine cannot be imposed instead of prison.
On electronic monitoring devices, see our guide to anti-abuse tags.
Where the order includes a ban on communication, any contact by WhatsApp, text message, call, email, social media or through a fake profile may be a breach. Article 48.3 CP refers to “written, verbal or visual” contact by any means.
If the order only bans approaching and not communicating, sending a message does not breach that specific measure, although depending on its content it could amount to other offences. That is why the court order or judgment must be read carefully.
Important: the protected person’s consent does not prevent the offence. The Supreme Court (Tribunal Supremo) has held since 2008 that, even if she agrees to the meeting, the person subject to the ban can be convicted. We explain this in is it an offence to see your partner under a restraining order if she consents?
Breach is an intentional offence. According to Supreme Court case law (for example, STS 567/2020 of 30 October), intent requires knowing about the court order and knowing that one’s own conduct breaches it. A formal warning of criminal liability is not required, but the person must have been served with the order. The questions are whether service was valid, exactly what the order prohibited and whether it was in force.
Bumping into someone by chance in a supermarket or in the street is not the same as seeking them out. What matters is what happens next: someone who walks away immediately in a chance encounter is not breaching the order voluntarily. The defence works with objective data: times, locations, witnesses or records from the device.
It must be proven that the set distance was exceeded or that contact took place and came from the accused: who actually controls the account or number, and how reliable the measurements and witness statements are.
Although consent does not rule out the offence, the Supreme Court has accepted on an exceptional basis (STS 803/2015 of 9 December) that there may be no liability where the approach results from a clear initiative of the protected person that is hard to avoid, and the accused remains passive.
If you have been accused, our area of defence of men accused of domestic or gender violence reviews these issues from the very start, always on the basis of the presumption of innocence.
If the order is not being respected, these steps help to prove the breach:
You can have a lawyer represent you as private prosecutor (acusación particular): in our area of representing women who are victims of gender violence we help you request more effective measures when the current ones are not enough. More information on how they work in restraining orders in gender violence cases.
Since the reform introduced by Organic Act 1/2025, the former gender violence courts have been merged into the Court of First Instance (Tribunal de Instancia). The investigation of the offence of breach falls to the Gender Violence Section (Sección de Violencia sobre la Mujer) where the protected person is or was the wife or partner of the accused, or one of the relatives listed in art. 89.5 g) of the Judiciary Act (Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial).
In the Alicante judicial district, the Gender Violence Section of the Court of First Instance, with four judges, is located at Avenida Aguilera, 53 (03007 Alicante), according to the Generalitat Valenciana’s online portal. In Torrevieja, the corresponding Section is at Calle Patricio Zammit, 50.
Celeste Pérez Bleda, member no. 7301 of the Alicante Bar Association (ICALI), has more than 20 years’ experience in criminal law and has assisted more than 800 detainees. We act for women who need the order to be enforced and for men accused of breaching it, in separate cases and with the same rigour.
Every case is different. If you would like a lawyer specialising in gender violence in Alicante to look at yours, get in touch: we reply the same day and can assist you in your own language.
If the protected person is or was your partner, or a relative under article 173.2 of the Criminal Code, the penalty is six months to one year in prison under article 468.2. It cannot be replaced by a fine within the offence itself. Whether you actually go to prison depends on other factors, such as your record or a possible suspension of the sentence.
Yes, if the order includes a ban on communication. Article 48.3 of the Criminal Code prohibits written, verbal or visual contact by any means, including computer or electronic means, which covers WhatsApp, social media, calls and emails. If the order only bans approaching, a message does not breach that measure, although its content could amount to another offence.
A chance encounter is not a breach if you did not seek it out and you walk away immediately, because the offence requires an intention to breach. What can be an offence is staying, approaching or starting a conversation. If it happens, write down what happened and speak to your lawyer.
It can happen. Article 544 bis of the Criminal Procedure Act requires the court, when the measure is breached, to call a hearing to consider remand in custody, a protection order or another more restrictive measure. The reasons, seriousness and circumstances of the breach are taken into account.
Do not reply, and keep all the messages with the date, time and number or profile visible. Report the breach at a police station or at the court, giving the number of the proceedings. If you feel you are in danger, ask the police or the emergency services for help, and then message us on WhatsApp at 607 449 491 (24 hours): we accompany you throughout the process. A lawyer can ask the court for more effective measures, such as electronic monitoring devices, when the current ones are not being respected.
The obligation to comply with the order is yours. Her consent does not prevent the offence. Do not respond, keep evidence of the contact and tell your lawyer.
Yes, by applying to the court. If the victim wants to resume contact, she must ask for the measure to be modified or set aside; it must never be ignored in practice.
Legal basis
Do you need help now?
On this page
Gender violence
Gender violence